Academic psychiatrists inhabit two professional identities: clinician and researcher. In some settings they also carry out teaching to a range of staff. These skills require rigorous training, yet various domains of psychiatry are evolving faster than its curricula. Drawing on our experiences as two early-career academic psychiatrists working in the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe, we reflect on how divergent health-system realities reveal shared challenges and opportunities for the future of the discipline. Despite stark contextual differences, we note young psychiatrists across settings report similar anxieties about preparedness, relevance and ethical practice. We suggest that the future of psychiatry should be shaped through a cross-cutting, global lens rather than siloed by geography or income level. We highlight tensions between the often crowded biomedical curricula and the skills increasingly required in practice, as well as emerging challenges posed by digital psychiatry and artificial intelligence (AI). We propose a reorientation of training towards digital and AI literacy, systems leadership, narrative competence, and advanced human communication skills. Preparing psychiatrists for 2050 requires training not only for today's clinical tasks, but for ethically navigating complexity, technology and inequality while remaining grounded in human connection.
Gnanapragasam et al. (Mon,) studied this question.