ABSTRACT Quantum spin liquids (QSLs) are magnetically frustrated phases characterized by spin fractionalization, emergent gauge fields, and long‐range entanglement. Quantum spin–orbital liquids (QSOLs) form a subset of QSLs with fluctuating orbital degrees of freedom, normally adding a layer of complexity to an already involved research field. This topical review provides guidelines for understanding a specific type of QSOL in which the orbital operators facilitate the analysis of quantum liquids, thereby providing adequate starting points for /exploring these phases. Such models are extensions of the spin‐1/2 Kitaev honeycomb model (KHM), in the sense that their exact solutions depend on an extensive number of conserved quantities, combined with a mapping to a problem of Majorana fermions hopping on a static gauge field. The starting points to understand such models are classical Hamiltonians characterized by bond‐dependent Ising interactions. Such classical models are exactly solvable in spin basis thanks to their extensive symmetries and can be directly connected to classical spin ice (CSI) systems that satisfy a Gauss law. QSOLs are easily stabilized in these models by applying a transverse field or introducing other exchange mechanisms that preserve the conserved local operators. The theory of such Ising QSOLs bridges the KHM to specific types of CSIs, thus providing further insight into paradigmatic forms of spin liquids. Furthermore, bond‐dependent Ising models are related to minimal Hamiltonians describing Rydberg‐atom simulations, which provide experimental grounds for investigating them.
Willian M. H. Natori (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: