This systematic review examined empirical literature regarding university students’ utilization of campus recreation programs (CRP) through the lens of the social-ecological model of health promotion. A comprehensive database search identified 22 articles published between 2004 and 2023, screened in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Findings indicate that a range of intrapersonal (e.g., gender differences and knowledge deficits), interpersonal (e.g. peer networks and family influences), institutional (e.g. facility accessibility and adapted programming), and community (e.g. cultural norms around body ideals or disability) factors shape CRP utilization. Further, CRP utilization was associated with multiple benefits, including enhanced physical and mental health, social connectedness, and academic outcomes. Despite methodological limitations, including a predominance of U.S.-based studies and uneven study quality, results underscore CRPs’ potential to foster holistic well-being and student success in higher education contexts.
Sim et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: