What does this research mean for the field?

A universal virtuality continuum model categorizes Extended Reality (XR), Mixed Reality (MR), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Augmented Virtuality (AV) based on their interdependencies and distinguishing features. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.METHODOLOGICAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The research aims to create a universal model for structuring technologies within the virtuality continuum.

February 26, 2026Open Access

Taxonomical analysis of the virtuality continuum components

Puntos clave

The research aims to create a universal model for structuring technologies within the virtuality continuum.
Conducted a taxonomic investigation of virtuality components including XR, MR, VR, AR, and AV.
Developed a conceptual framework to understand interdependencies and features of each component.
Utilized classification algorithms to compare components across seven dimensions.
XR received the highest score (4.00/5) for its comprehensive benefits.
AR scored 3.57/5 due to its mobility and autonomy.
VR garnered 3.43/5 for popularity and equipment availability.
MR and AV scored lower (2.57/5 and 2.43/5 respectively) due to complexities and limitations.

Resumen

The aim of the research was to develop a universal virtuality continuum model for future grouping and structuring of applicable technologies and their future potential analysis. The object of research was the continuum of virtuality as a theoretical model of interaction of the real and virtual world. The problem addressed was the lack of specific terminological base and conditions for dividing the elements of virtuality, which hinders their inclusion in science, business, and everyday life. To reach a solution, the paper did a taxonomic investigation of components of the continuum, namely: Extended Reality (XR), Mixed Reality (MR), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) and Augmented Virtuality (AV). It offered a generalised conceptual framework which reveals their interdependencies, shared and distinguishing features. According to the findings of the research, XR technology received the highest score (4.00/5) because it combined the benefits of VR, AR, and AV. AR experienced high autonomy and mobility (3.57/5), hence it was convenient for mobile application. VR (3.43/5) was defined by its popularity and availability of the equipment. MR (2.57/5) was rated lower due to its high technical complexity to implement and AV (2.43/5) due to its limited applications and high cost to implement. The conclusions of the study were made on the grounds of formal object classification algorithms and comparison thereof on seven dimensions: mobility, autonomy, affordability, popularity, market growth, applicability, technological maturity. The method was distinguished by the integration of concept base analysis with consideration of practical examples of technology use in various industries, and quantitative analysis based on open-source statistics. The practical value of the results lies in their potential application in the development of user interfaces, the design of advanced information technology tools, and the modelling of virtual environments. The obtained indicators are determined by the high accuracy of the analysis, which is directly proportional to the number of characteristics considered

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo