The Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) system in England is under scrutiny. Critics highlight inefficient service design, poor implementation, and adversarial processes that cause family-level distress. Unmet needs deprive children of learning, harming long-term prospects. Legislative changes in 2014 mandated professionals from multiple sectors to produce integrated child-centred support plans. Since then, little peer-reviewed research has asked professionals about key influences on SEND provision, interagency working, or service-user outcomes. We conducted focus-group discussions with 35 SEND professionals, using a topic guide co-developed with parents/carers of children with SEND. Thematic analysis identified several system-level influences: increasing bureaucracy which diverted resources from early intervention; increasing SEND presentations and complexity; inadequate resources and training; over-dependence on parents’/carers’ advocacy; poor relationships with families; harmful education policies. Good interagency working depended on information sharing, relationships, shared understandings of SEND, and access to specialists. Long waiting-lists, delayed provision and gaps in post-16 services worsened children’s outcomes. Securing SEND provision was said to punish parents/carers; children with fewer resources were unseen. Repairing the system requires parallel actions to increase human resources, improve training and interagency working, and reduce parent/carer burden when obtaining SEND provision. Without substantial investment, delivering a child-centred system that meets needs remains impossible.
Saxton et al. (Wed,) studied this question.