We present a unified, compute-accounted comparison of seven pipelines for compound facial-expression recognition on RAF-DB: two classical hybrids (ResNet50–SVM, VGGFace–SVM), two modern baselines (EfficientNetV2-S, ViT-B/16), and three quantum-enhanced hybrids (QCNN, QKNN, QSVM). Beyond top-1 accuracy, we report feature-extraction (FX), training, and per-sample classification time to expose accuracy–efficiency trade-offs. ViT-B/16 achieves the highest accuracy (63.13%) with very low FX (~ 32.84 s) but at the cost of longer training time; EfficientNetV2-S is competitive (60.9%) with a short training time but higher FX (~ 2056.92 s). Among quantum hybrids, QSVM offers the best accuracy (54.97%) at moderate FX (~ 61.6 s), QKNN yields the most deployment-friendly FX (~ 24.47 s; 36.02% accuracy), and QCNN is FX-minimal (~ 11.9 s) but accuracy-limited (35.69%). Confusions cluster along fear–surprise and sadness–disgust, suggesting AU-aware local attention, margin-shaping objectives, and fairness-oriented augmentation. Overall, QSVM is the accuracy-leading quantum option under moderate budgets, QKNN suits tight latency envelopes, and EfficientNet/ViT remain strong when compute is ample. The protocol, ablations, and statistical tests (McNemar, BCa CIs, Cliff’s δ) support reproducible, decision-oriented benchmarking. We do not claim near-term “quantum advantage”; instead we provide a compute-accounted benchmark and a feasibility-oriented analysis. Additional analyses include a strictly matched classical SVM baseline for quantum-kernel attribution, a lightweight kernel-shaping validation (fusion + regularisation), and a hardware-normalized cost discussion motivating simulator-based experiments at dataset scale.
Florestiyanto et al. (Fri,) studied this question.