Assessing urban resilience under compound shocks requires observable and comparable process evidence that can inform resilient land governance and cross-jurisdiction planning. Using China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones (PFTZs) as a staged institutional setting, this research examines whether institutional exposure is associated with deviation–recovery trajectories of urban activity during the 2020 COVID-19 shock and whether these associations propagate through spatial spillovers with an identifiable scale profile. Institutional exposure is operationalized by the prefecture-level cities actually covered by PFTZ functional areas. With harmonized administrative boundaries, we construct an annual city-level VIIRS nighttime light (NTL) series for 2013–2024 and treat NTL as an activity-change signal rather than a direct proxy for output. We trace shock deviation in 2020 and subsequent recovery via staged differencing. Spatial interaction frictions are represented by least-cost path distance (LCPD) derived from a multi-source cost surface, which is used to build a gravity-based spatial weight matrix. Estimation relies on the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM), with LeSage–Pace impact decomposition to distinguish direct and spillover effects, complemented by distance-threshold diagnostics to map attenuation patterns. Results indicate persistent clustering within the PFTZ-related urban system. The shock year is characterized by compressed connectivity and fragmented brightening, whereas recovery proceeds in a layered manner with earlier core repair, partial corridor reconnection, and weaker adjustment at the periphery. Spatial dependence in activity change is statistically significant. Associations linked to institutional exposure are realized primarily locally, while structural and scale conditions more readily operate through spatial externalities. Spillovers are most detectable at meso-scales and attenuate gradually across distance thresholds. Overall, the integrated earth-observation and spatial-econometric framework provides replicable geospatial evidence to support resilient land governance and regional coordination under common shocks.
Ru et al. (Fri,) studied this question.