Objective Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common cause of episodic vertigo but lacks objective diagnostic biomarkers. The symptomatic overlap of VM with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and Meniere’s disease (MD) complicates differential diagnosis. Given that elevated serum Otolin-1 and Otoconin-90 (OC90) levels are established biomarkers in BPPV and MD, this study aimed to determine whether these otoconia-derived proteins are also altered in VM. Methods In this case-control study, 40 patients with definite VM and 143 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Serum samples were collected during the interictal period. Otolin-1 and OC90 levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results No significant differences were found in serum levels of Otolin-1 and OC90 between groups. The median (IQR) Otolin-1 level was 215.5 pg/mL (127.5–314.9) in the VM group vs. 200.6 pg/mL (127.7–284.2) in controls (Cliff’s δ = 0.08, p = 0.526). Similarly, the median (IQR) OC90 level was 39.8 ng/mL (29.4–60.8) compared to 32.7 ng/mL (27.9–77.9) in controls (Cliff’s δ = −0.07, p = 0.659). No correlations were observed between protein levels and clinical features. However, within the VM group, serum Otolin-1 levels were highest within 1-week post-attack and declined thereafter, showing a significant negative correlation with time ( r = −0.372, p = 0.018). A similar phase-dependent pattern was observed for OC90 levels across the VM subgroups ( p = 0.017), though without a significant correlation with continuous time. Conclusion These preliminary findings indicate that serum Otolin-1 and OC90 levels are not altered in patients with VM compared to healthy controls. Exploratory analysis revealed a phase-dependent decrease in Otolin-1 within the VM group post-attack. These results argue against significant structural damage to otoconia in VM and support a central/functional pathophysiology. While not positive diagnostic biomarkers, normal levels of these proteins may provide negative evidence to aid in differentiating VM from BPPV or MD, pending future validation.
Li et al. (Fri,) studied this question.