Human-driven soil erosion is a signal of the widely debated “Anthropocene”. There is widespread controversy regarding the time consistency and time transgression of human-driven soil erosion in the Late Holocene. In this study, three well-dated cores, B10, B14 and W20 from west to east, spanning the past 4–6 ka from the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) shelf, southern China, were selected for elemental tests. Principal component analysis divides the elements into four components. The first principal component (PC1) includes TFe2O3, Al2O3, V, Cs, Rb, Ga, TiO2, K2O, Ta, Nb, MnO, Th, LOI, and Cl, being the proxy for fine-grained terrigenous input and watershed soil erosion. The PC1 variations in B10 and B14 reveal that erosion enhanced at ~2.2 ka BP, and less erosion occurred at ~1.5 ka BP but has intensified since ~1.2 ka BP, which is consistent with the simulated cropland area of the Pearl River Basin and lake records in the upper West River, southwestern China. However, the records from the W20 reveal a continuous increase in terrestrial input since 2.2 ka BP, which is consistent with the soil erosion changes recorded by the South China coast lakes at its provenance region. Hence, differences in the initial age of the signals of human activities were revealed in the PRE shelf system. Our study not only reveals the time transgression of the “Anthropocene” boundary but also updates the sediment source-to-sink model of the PRE shelf system.
Tang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: