ABSTRACT Background: The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) with electronic health record (EHR) systems represents a transformative opportunity for public healthcare delivery in resource-constrained settings. However, evidence on implementation readiness, governance structures, and equity implications within India's district-level public health systems remains critically limited. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design was employed across three districts in Bihar (Patna, Muzaffarpur, and Vaishali) and the state's 104 Health Helpline Centers. Quantitative surveys (n=135) assessed system utilization, perceived benefits, and implementation barriers among healthcare professionals, IT personnel, administrators, and patients. Qualitative in-depth interviews (n=20) explored governance mechanisms, ethical awareness, and contextual implementation challenges. Facility-level case studies documented operational workflows and digital maturity. Triangulation was employed to strengthen validity and interpretive depth. Results: While 78.5% of surveyed facilities utilized EHR systems, only 34.8% demonstrated AI-enabled functionalities, concentrated predominantly in urban tertiary settings. Facilities with AI-supported modules reported significantly improved operational efficiency, including enhanced patient throughput and reduced documentation time. Respondents demonstrated strong agreement regarding AI's role in clinical decision-making (mean=4.33±0.64), diagnostic accuracy (mean=4.25±0.68), and data-driven planning (mean=4.41±0.59). Critical implementation barriers included infrastructure inadequacy (72.6%), workforce capacity gaps (69.6%), data privacy concerns (64.4%), and interoperability deficits (61.5%). Only 38% of facilities engaged in active data-sharing across platforms. Qualitative analysis revealed limited understanding of algorithmic transparency, accountability frameworks, and bias mitigation mechanisms. Stakeholder acceptance of AI remained high when tangible efficiency gains were demonstrated, challenging assumptions that resistance constitutes the primary adoption barrier. Conclusion: AI-EHR integration within Bihar's public healthcare ecosystem is both feasible and beneficial when supported by robust infrastructure, workforce development, standardized data governance, and ethical oversight mechanisms. Findings reveal that technical capability alone is insufficient; sustainable implementation requires coordinated investments in district-level governance structures, interoperability standards, capacity-building programs, and equity-sensitive design. This study provides actionable evidence for policymakers and contributes district-level empirical insights to a literature dominated by tertiary-care and high-resource settings. Keywords: artificial intelligence; electronic health records; public health systems; digital health governance; health equity; Bihar; implementation science; clinical decision support
Kumar et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: