What question did this study set out to answer?

This work aims to present v0.2 of the Riemann–Navier mapping protocol, focusing on observable coherence and transport relationships.

March 3, 2026Open Access

Riemann–Navier Mapping Protocol v0.2 | Implementation Entry

Puntos clave

This work aims to present v0.2 of the Riemann–Navier mapping protocol, focusing on observable coherence and transport relationships.
Introduced implementation entry for clarity in coherence scoring.
Established a frozen gate design to assess coherence outcomes as PASS/FAIL/INCOMPLETE.
Developed a ledger to maintain consistent definitions and prevent drift.
Successfully linked a Riemann-side observable to a Navier-Stokes-side observable using coherence scores.
Implemented strict governance to avoid overclaims and ensure audit integrity.

Resumen

This release is v0. 2 (Implementation Entry) for the Riemann–Navier mapping series. What this is An audit-first mapping protocol that links a Riemann-side observable (spectral/phase coherence) to a Navier–Stokes-side observable (transport/dissipation proxy) via a frozen gate design. Not a proof. Not an equivalence claim. NO OVERCLAIM. What is new in v0. 2 (vs v0. 1 Concept Lock) Adds an implementation entry: Aₒbj/Bₒbj -> coherence scores -> coherence gate Gcoh. Freezes the coherence gate outcome labels as PASS / FAIL / INCOMPLETE under a shared audit state. Adds Figure IM1 (implementation map) and an SI definition ledger to prevent definition drift and RISK-3 definition split. Maintains strict non-circularity (no RH zero tables; no known-solution tables; no post-hoc gate fitting). Artefacts (this record) Main (PDF, Nature-style) SI (PDF, Nature-style) INSTALLME (ASCII txt) Figure IM1 (PNG) Governance Audit-first | NO OVERCLAIM | FACT-BASED Axis: Peace / Non-violence / Dignity Dual-use boundary: NO military / NO surveillance / NO coercion

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo