Promoters are essential in transcriptional regulation, with the -10 and -35 boxes playing a critical role in determining their strength. Modulating these regions can effectively fine-tune promoter strength. However, the lack of a clear quantitative relationship between sequence composition and transcriptional output impedes the rational design of promoters. To address this, we developed a synthetic promoter library by varying RNA polymerase binding energies at the -10 and -35 boxes. The library was partitioned into four sublibraries with expression strengths spanning an 80-fold range. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by sequencing, we identified 20,799 distinct promoters. Analysis of this library uncovered distinct sequence-activity patterns, including a small subset of -35 box sequences that consistently conferred high transcriptional output across diverse -10 partners. Based on this, we developed an artificial intelligence platform that integrates a convolutional neural network for strength prediction (Pearson's r = 0.84) with a balanced generative adversarial network incorporating a gradient penalty for de novo promoter design. By coupling these models, we achieved a precise design of promoters with user-defined strengths (r = 0.85), establishing a bidirectional framework that links -10/-35 boxes to transcriptional activity through deep learning. This study expands the sequence diversity of functional -10 and -35 boxes in E. coli, provides a predictive platform for rational promoter engineering, and deciphers combinatorial motif interactions governing transcriptional regulation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhou et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75aafc6e9836116a20d4d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5c00765
Xuan Zhou
Nana Ding
Shenghu Zhou
ACS Synthetic Biology
Jiangnan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: