This article presents a systematic critical literature review examining how policy overload and related concepts such as policy accumulation, layering, and administrative burden are defined, applied, and studied in Sub-Saharan African education research. Drawing on thematic synthesis, the review analyzes forty peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025. The analysis identifies three central patterns: fragmented conceptualization of policy overload, predominantly qualitative and descriptive empirical approaches, and limited integration of street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation complexity perspectives. The findings show that policy overload in African education systems is most often treated as an implicit condition rather than an explicit analytical construct, with reforms accumulating faster than institutional capacity to implement them. The review highlights key research gaps, including the absence of a shared conceptual vocabulary, limited longitudinal and comparative designs, and insufficient theorization of agency in mediating overload. The article concludes by proposing an interpretive framework that conceptualizes policy overload as both a structural governance condition and a lived implementation experience, offering directions for future theory-building and empirical research.
Issahaku et al. (Mon,) studied this question.