We investigated the impact of operating room pharmacists on the appropriate use of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Patients without intervention by operating room pharmacists (April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019) and those who underwent intervention by operating room pharmacists (October 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021) were compared. Additionally, an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis was conducted as a sensitivity analysis to assess temporal trends. Overall, 1697 patients (999 in the non-intervention group and 698 in the intervention group) were included, and 213 matched pairs were analyzed after 1 : 1 propensity score matching. The compliance rate of AMP administered within 1 h prior to incision was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group (98.1 vs. 93.4%; p = 0.027). In the subgroup analysis, the compliance rate of the guideline-recommended initial dose in patients weighing ≥80 kg was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group (93.1 vs. 70.7%; p ind) <50 mL/min was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group (89.8 vs. 80.4%; p = 0.041). ITS analysis showed that the improvement trend in AMP compliance stabilized after the intervention, indicating sustained intraoperative management. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative or total hospital stay between the two groups. In conclusion, interventions by operating room pharmacists significantly improved the appropriate use of intraoperative AMP.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Kitasato University
Kitasato Institute Hospital
Kitasato University Hospital
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Tomizawa et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: