Inicio
Explorar
nav.journalClub
Tendencias
Más
synapse
⌘+K
Idioma
Español
Español
Scientific Reviewing—Editors’ Memo to Emerging Reviewers − 2 | Synapse
March 3, 2026
Open Access
Scientific Reviewing—Editors’ Memo to Emerging Reviewers − 2
SE
Shahul Ebrahim
Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako
ZM
Ziad A. Memish
Puntos clave
Key practices for effective scientific reviewing include thorough literature synthesis and clarity in editorial decision-making.
Emerging reviewers are guided by established principles to ensure quality in peer review and improve the manuscript evaluation process.
Observational analysis across various editorial scenarios reveals the importance of timely feedback and constructive criticism.
Supporting emerging reviewers not only enhances their skills but may enable better quality control in scientific publishing.
Leer artículo completo
con IA
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo
Cite This Study
Copy
Ebrahim et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75dcac6e9836116a2803d
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00505-8
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo