Exile is a key dimension of armed groups, which often depend on the safety of third-party countries to establish headquarters, train soldiers, and forge connections with the outside world. A fitting illustration are the Frontline States in Africa, which offered refuge to multiple national liberation movements in the second half the twentieth century. While it is generally acknowledged that exile offers ample opportunities for armed groups to develop their organizations, the ability of host nations to influence the internal politics of exiled armed groups remains understudied. This paper offers a comparative analysis of the interventions of the Frontline States in the mutinies of three African national liberation movements. We argue that intervention in the internal affairs of anticolonial organizations was a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it contributed to the successful conclusion of the struggle for liberation, but on the other hand, it stimulated the development of authoritarian political culture.
Hoog et al. (Wed,) studied this question.