This study develops and validates surrogate models in a standardized environment for three key CO2 utilization processes: methanol, ammonia, and urea production. Linear and nonlinear models were constructed using Latin Hypercube Sampling data from Aspen Plus simulations and evaluated across multiple data set sizes (40-320 points). Performance was assessed using a comprehensive set of statistical metrics (R 2, adjusted R 2, predicted R 2, 5-fold cross-validation R 2, RMSE, and MAE), supported by confidence interval plots to capture both predictive accuracy and generalization. Results show that quadratic models more effectively capture nonlinear trends in the methanol and ammonia processes, particularly for larger data set sizes, while linear models maintain strong generalization and computational efficiency, especially for urea. For small sample sizes, inflated R 2 values masked overfitting in quadratic models, an issue revealed only through predicted R 2, cross validation, and error metrics. Convergence of all performance measures at higher data sizes confirmed the importance of sufficient sampling to ensure robust surrogate behavior. Computational performance benchmarking of selected models illustrated significant savings in prediction times compared to those of simulation. Beyond individual process insights, the validated surrogate models presented here serve as a benchmark for different CO2 utilization processes in a standardized testing environment. They provide a consolidated and reusable resource for CO2 utilization research and are intended as modular building blocks that can be readily embedded into enterprise-wide optimization frameworks of industrial eco-park network models. A case study is also provided to demonstrate error propagation in interconnected process units replaced by surrogates resulting in low deviations from simulation. By reducing computational burden while maintaining predictive reliability, these models support both academic investigations and practical decarbonization initiatives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Faadil et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a767f1badf0bb9e87e2fcb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c10202
Mohamed Faadil
Khalifa University of Science and Technology
Mohammed S. Alhajeri
Kuwait University
Ali Almansoori
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
ACS Omega
University of Waterloo
Kuwait University
Khalifa University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...