Eating disorders (EDs) disproportionately affect women and are associated with substantial morbidity, chronicity, and mortality. While established psychological models focus on the content of maladaptive cognitions related to body weight, shape, and eating behaviors, growing evidence suggests that additional process-level mechanisms contribute to symptom persistence and treatment resistance. Metacognitive models emphasize how individuals relate to their thoughts, emotions, and internal experiences, highlighting maladaptive beliefs about thinking and the resulting cognitive–attentional patterns (e.g., repetitive negative thinking, self-focused attention, and inflexible attentional control) as potential maintaining factors across psychopathology. This narrative review synthesizes the theoretical and empirical literature on metacognitive dysfunction in EDs, with a focus on mechanisms that may be particularly relevant for women. We integrate epidemiological data and gender-sensitive frameworks, and review evidence on metacognitive beliefs and cognitive–attentional syndrome (CAS)-related processes across anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder. Overall, studies indicate that dysfunctional beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts, alongside perseverative cognitive styles, are associated with greater ED symptom severity. We discuss diagnosis-relevant patterns as clinically useful heuristics, interactions with sociocultural and emotional vulnerability factors, and implications for assessment, treatment integration, and prevention. The evidence base is largely correlational and derived from predominantly female samples, underscoring the need for longitudinal research and studies that explicitly test sex/gender as a moderator.
Raffone et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: