Tree-based production systems embedded within Amazonian biocultural landscapes remain systematically undervalued in global climate, biodiversity, and development policy frameworks. This study assessed tree diversity, structural attributes, and carbon stocks across traditional cacao-based Amazonian agroforestry systems (Chakra), tree-rich silvopastoral systems, and old-growth forests in the Andean–Amazon transition zone of Ecuador. Based on 28 sampling plots (DBH ≥ 10 cm), old-growth forests stored the highest aboveground carbon stocks, while agroforestry and silvopastoral systems retained approximately 20–30% of forest carbon, equivalent to ~100–180 Mg CO2-equivalent ha−1—far exceeding values reported for monocultures or treeless pastures. A total of 151 tree species were recorded across all land-use systems, with forests harboring the highest richness (122 species), followed by agroforestry (35 species) and silvopastoral systems (28 species). Carbon storage was highly concentrated in a limited subset of multifunctional species: in agroforestry systems, eight species accounted for ~80% of total aboveground CO2-equivalent stocks, whereas in silvopastoral systems only five species explained a similar proportion. Dominant taxa such as Cordia alliodora, Inga edulis, Jacaranda copaia, Piptocoma discolor, and Piptadenia pteroclada illustrate a process of biocultural species filtering, whereby trees providing food, timber, shade, and cultural value are selectively retained while sustaining significant carbon stocks. These findings demonstrate that tree-based productive systems function as biocultural productive landscapes that conserve carbon, biodiversity, and livelihoods beyond forest boundaries. We argue for their formal inclusion, particularly traditional silvopastoral systems, within climate finance mechanisms, nationally determined contributions (NDCs), and biocultural heritage frameworks, alongside forest conservation strategies.
Torres et al. (Tue,) studied this question.