The transition from theoretical knowledge to operative performance represents a pivotal stage in surgical training. Although trainees may accurately reproduce the visible technical steps demonstrated by supervisors, the underlying operative reasoning and risk anticipation are not always explicitly conveyed. Decisions regarding dissection planes, energy application, and tissue handling often reflect implicit experience-based judgment. This gap between observable action and internal reasoning may limit the development of independent surgical thinking and increase the likelihood of preventable technical errors during early operative training. This technical report proposes drawing as an active reflective tool to enhance risk awareness in surgical education. Using mesoappendix division during laparoscopic appendectomy as an illustrative example, the PRAI (Purpose-Risk-Approach-Illustration) framework is introduced to guide structured stepwise reflection. Through simplified anatomical reconstruction, trainees identify essential structures, delineate risk zones, and clarify the relationship between operative objectives and technical strategy. Drawing in this context functions not merely as a visual aid but as a cognitive process that transforms operative experience into structured spatial understanding. By reconstructing operative steps through illustration, trainees may strengthen spatial orientation, anticipate complications more effectively, and transition from imitative performance toward analytical reasoning. Importantly, illustrated reflection is not intended to replace established reflective practices such as operative debriefing, operative note review, or cognitive task analysis, but rather to serve as a complementary structured reflective tool. Drawing may also create cognitive “memory anchors” that facilitate spatial encoding and retention. Future research may evaluate its educational impact using established assessment tools, including Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) domains such as respect for tissue, instrument handling, and procedural flow; structured surgical error taxonomies (e.g., incorrect dissection plane or inappropriate energy use); near-miss event documentation such as bleeding from premature vessel division or potential thermal injury to adjacent bowel; time to identification of critical anatomical structures (e.g., the appendiceal artery); and cognitive workload scales such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Such metrics may allow quantitative evaluation of whether illustrated reflection improves operative judgment and technical safety.
Loc H Tran (Sun,) studied this question.