Pulse Explorar nav.journalClub Debates Tendencias Investigadores Revistas

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

Objective Risk Assessment vs Standard Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes | Synapse

December 10, 2020Open Access

Ver artículo completo

Objective Risk Assessment vs Standard Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes

DCDerek P. ChewSouth Australia Pathology KHKarice HyunPreventive Cardiology EMErin MortonFlinders University

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12614000550606.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Chew et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b32bdcd4fb4cf4986501ba https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6314

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Baseline Risk of Major Bleeding in Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction2009 · 1,007 citations
2Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial2019 · 36 citations
3Discordance between level of risk and intensity of evidence‐based treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes2007 · 39 citations
42015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation2015 · 8,325 citations
5Predicting Risk in ACS2017 · 3 citations