The experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) seasons of 2022–23 and 2023–24 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the effect of different levels of nitrogen along with foliar applications of nano urea and neem-coated urea on growth, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design (RBD) with 15 treatments. These treatments combined basal nitrogen levels of 0, 50, 75, 100 and 125% of recommended nitrogen doses (RDN), along with foliar application of water spray (WS), nano-urea (NU) and neem-coated urea (NCU) in each level with 3 replications. The results demonstrated that treatments with reduced basal nitrogen, specifically with nano-urea application, achieved growth and yield comparable to the higher conventional dose of RDN. Foliar application of neem-coated urea along with 75% RDN produced significantly lower yield than RDN. However, 75% RDN + NU spray yielded 4.85 t/ha, which was at par with 100% RDN + WS (5.55 t/ha). Similarly, yield from 100% RDN + NU was equivalent to that of the 125% RDN treatments, regardless of the specific foliar spray applied. Under each level of RDN (125%, 100%, 75% and 50%), foliar application of nano-urea was a bit superior to neem-coated urea, though the differences were not significant. Yield attributes were also markedly improved with higher nitrogen doses and foliar sprays. The nano-urea had slightly higher total cost of cultivation over urea foliar application. However, among the treatments, 125% RDN + NU recorded significantly higher net return (1,33,909 ₹/ha) though it was at par with RDN. This two-year study showed that moderate nitrogen doses, especially in conjunction with nano-urea foliar treatments, can substantially enhance growth, yield attributes and yield, highlighting nano-fertilisers as a promising alternative for improving soil health, nutrient availability and yield, supporting more sustainable agriculture.
PATEL et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: