Ensuring the required microclimate parameters is the most critical task in hot climates. In pig farms, air cooling is provided by means of steam-compression chillers or evaporative cooling, which is the simplest way to cool the air. The implementation of evaporative cooling depends largely on the interaction of the media involved in this process. This paper considers the process of interaction of cooling water with the surface of a cellular polycarbonate heat exchanger. A mathematical model describing the process of wetting the sprayed surface of the heat exchanger is obtained. The authors determined the theoretical water flow rate required to provide air cooling for a given operation mode. Experimental trials of a recuperative heat recovery unit with a heat exchanger made of cellular polycarbonate equipped with a water evaporative cooling system were carried out. The authors conducted a comparative assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of evaporative cooling in a heat recovery unit equipped with a polycarbonate heat exchanger versus panel evaporative systems using wetted paper pads at pig farms in the Vladimir and Tambov regions of Russia. The panel evaporative coolers provided a temperature reduction of 11.3 °C without any splashing effect. Under the same operating conditions, the heat recovery unit achieved an inlet air temperature reduction of 10.5 °C, accompanied by splashing. When the water flow rate supplied for evaporation was reduced until the splashing ceased, the cooling temperature drop decreased to 10.1 °C, which is 11% lower, compared with the paper pads. The study revealed characteristic operating modes for the unit that ensure effective air cooling, depending on the cooling water flow rate. Since the prevailing temperature during the system’s main operating time is significantly lower than the design temperature (the absolute temperature maximum), to achieve effective cooling of the supply air without splashing or excessive water waste, the cooling circuit water should circulate at a flow rate within 40 to 63% of the maximum design value. Alternatively, an automated control system should be employed to regulate the water supply based on outdoor air temperature and humidity.
Ignatkin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.