Communal conflicts pose persistent threats to peace and development in diverse societies, particularly in post-colonial African contexts where state-centric approaches often lack local legitimacy. While formal institutions struggle with accessibility and trust, traditional authorities, rooted in cultural norms, offer culturally resonant mechanisms for mediation and reconciliation. This study examines the contributions of traditional institutions to managing communal conflicts in Ilorin, the multi-ethnic emirate capital of Kwara State, Nigeria. Drawing on a descripto-explanatory design, purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews with 30 stakeholders (including 20 traditional rulers), Likertscale questionnaires, thematic analysis, and triangulation with secondary sources and media reports, the research investigates conflict drivers, security impacts, and the roles/challenges of traditional actors. Findings reveal land disputes and political competition as primary triggers (means >4.17), with significant effects on economic disruption, property destruction, and resource strain. Traditional rulers, led by the Emir, wield strong moral authority (mean 4.43), accessibility, and trust, often surpassing formal systems, through consensus-based mediation, elder involvement, and reconciliation practices. However, modernization, political interference, and resource constraints pose challenges. The study underscores the enduring relevance of traditional institutions in hybrid peacebuilding and recommends constitutional recognition, capacity-building, inclusive reforms (e.g., youth/women involvement), and state-traditional collaboration. These insights contribute to debates on indigenous mechanisms in conflict transformation and offer policy pathways for sustainable peace in Nigeria's pluralistic settings.
Abdullahi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: