What question did this study set out to answer?

The central aim is to address the need for revised ethical frameworks in academic publishing related to AI issues.

March 25, 2026Open Access

Prompt injection in manuscripts: exploiting loopholes or crossing ethical lines?

Puntos clave

The central aim is to address the need for revised ethical frameworks in academic publishing related to AI issues.
Identified loopholes in current ethical guidelines.
Analyzed the impact of AI on the peer review process.
Proposed new policies to enhance transparency and integrity.
Highlights the lack of current ethical standards for AI in publishing.
Demonstrates the necessity for updated policies in the peer review process.
Suggests improvements to maintain academic integrity.

Resumen

This study highlights the urgent need for revised ethical frameworks that incorporate AI-related issues in academic publishing, advocating for policies that promote transparency and uphold the integrity of the peer review process.

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37acab34aaaeb1a67c974 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00187-7

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo