The reconstruction of nodal prices and generation patterns in electricity markets with network constraints constitutes a challenging inverse analysis problem due to congestion-induced non-uniqueness and limited observability. This study introduces node symmetry analysis as a novel early indicator of locational marginal price (LMP) growth in power systems with high renewable energy penetration. Symmetric nodes, defined as nodes with identical generation cost structures and comparable network topology, exhibit near-identical price signals under uncongested conditions. In this study, the term “price” refers to the LMP obtained from the DC-OPF market-clearing model under scenarios with high renewable energy penetration. Deviations from this symmetry, quantified through price differences between symmetric node pairs (ΔLMP), serve as sensitive indicators of emerging network stress and congestion, providing early warning of peak-price events. Using DC power flow sensitivities and congestion indicators, LMPs are reconstructed in a simplified five-node test system under three scenarios: baseline operation, severe transmission congestion, and high renewable generation variability. Results show strong correlations between symmetry violations and system-wide price increases. In congested scenarios, ΔLMP exceeding €2/MWh consistently precedes peak prices by 1–2 h, demonstrating the metric’s predictive capability. Integration of storage further highlights the operational value of symmetry-based analysis, showing reductions in curtailed renewable generation and peak prices. The proposed framework offers a computationally efficient and interpretable tool for congestion diagnosis, price trend forecasting, and inverse market analysis, with potential scalability to larger AC networks and stochastic scenarios. These findings provide actionable insights for system operators, market participants, and regulators seeking to enhance flexibility, reliability, and economic efficiency in high-renewable electricity markets.
Zicmane et al. (Mon,) studied this question.