Abstract Background Neurointensive care is moving toward more automated patient management. This study aimed to evaluate a novel external ventricular drainage (EVD) system, the VGuard® system, as a tool for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and automating ventricular drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), focusing on its safety and potential to reduce complications associated with manual EVD management. Methods This prospective, randomized clinical study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Patients (aged > 18 years) with different acute brain pathologies requiring an EVD were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to receive the VGuard® system or a manual EVD. Both systems employed a ventricular probe for simultaneous intraventricular and intraparenchymal ICP monitoring. Measurement accuracy was determined by comparing the median of absolute difference in ICP, using the Mann–Whitney U test. To further investigate the accuracy of ICP measuring, a post hoc Spearman correlation test was applied. In addition, as part of a post hoc analysis, we evaluated patient outcomes. Results A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The VGuard® system demonstrated significantly better accuracy in ICP measurements compared with the manual EVD; median absolute difference: 1.07 versus 2.88, p < 0.001; median Spearman correlation coefficients: 0.81 versus 0.48, p < 0.05. There were no statistically significant differences in patient outcomes mortality, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), median time with the EVD, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, or adverse events (AE). No serious adverse events were noted. Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate the VGuard® system, showing results of increased accuracy in measured ICP compared with the manual EVD. The VGuard® system offers an automated EVD solution, representing a step toward increased neurointensive care automation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Öhman et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67eaf0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02477-4
Josefine Maria Öhman
Lund University
Niklas Marklund
Lund University
David Cederberg
Neurocritical Care
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: