Height-adjusted sarcopenia was independently associated with a 48% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.48) in older patients hospitalized for heart failure, whereas BMI-adjusted sarcopenia was not.
Cohort (n=594)
No
Does sarcopenia defined by height-adjusted vs BMI-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass predict mortality and functional decline in older patients hospitalized for heart failure?
In older patients hospitalized for heart failure, height-adjusted sarcopenia is a stronger predictor of mortality, while BMI-adjusted sarcopenia better reflects physical functional impairment.
Estimación del efecto: HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.035-2.117)
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 31.2% vs 24%
valor p: p=0.032
Background: The 2025 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) updated diagnostic criteria redefine sarcopenia based on low muscle strength and low skeletal muscle mass, incorporating body mass index (BMI)-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) alongside height-adjusted ASM. The clinical relevance of these definitions in heart failure (HF) patients remains unclear.
Ozaki et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=594). H-sarcopenia (height-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass) vs. No H-sarcopenia was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.035-2.117, p=0.032). Height-adjusted sarcopenia was independently associated with a 48% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.48) in older patients hospitalized for heart failure, whereas BMI-adjusted sarcopenia was not.