Participants with >4% vigorous physical activity had 29%–61% lower risks of eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality compared with those with 0% VPA (P<0.001).
Cohort (n=472,138)
Does a higher proportion of vigorous physical activity reduce the incidence of multiple chronic diseases and all-cause mortality in adults?
A higher proportion of vigorous physical activity, independent of total activity volume, is inversely associated with the incidence of major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality, suggesting intensity has a higher preventive potential than volume.
Estimación del efecto: 29%-61% lower risk
valor p: p=<0.001
Abstract Background and aims While vigorous physical activity (VPA) is known to provide greater health benefits per unit time than moderate activity, the spectrum of these benefits across different chronic diseases and the relative importance of physical activity (PA) intensity vs volume remain unclear. This study examined associations between the proportion of VPA (%VPA) relative to total volume of PA and the incidence of multiple chronic disease outcomes. Methods This prospective population-based cohort study included 96,408 participants (mean age 61.9 years, women: 56.3%) with device-measured data (wrist-worn accelerometers) and 375,730 participants (mean age 56.2 years, women: 52.2%) with self-reported PA data (IPAQ) from the UK Biobank. Main outcomes included incidence of eight chronic diseases: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), atrial fibrillation (AFib), type 2 diabetes (T2D), immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), chronic respiratory diseases (CRD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dementia, as well as all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. Results In the device-measured data, non-linear inverse dose–response relationships were observed between %VPA and all outcomes (all P .001), and these patterns remained consistent across strata of total PA volume. In multivariable models adjusted for total PA volume, participants with 4% VPA had 29%–61% lower risks of these outcomes compared with those with 0% VPA. Joint analyses and population attributable fraction revealed distinct disease-specific patterns: immune-mediated inflammatory diseases showed very strong intensity-dependence with minimal contribution from PA volume (20.3% for intensity vs 1.0% for volume), while MACE (17.8% vs 6.0%), AFib (16.2% vs 5.0%), CRD (21.4% vs 5.6%), and dementia (32.3% vs 8.1%) demonstrated intensity predominance with modest contribution from PA volume, and T2D (26.6% vs 17.7%), MASLD (22.1% vs 16.6%), CKD (23.0% vs 15.3%), and all-cause mortality (31.4% vs 14.2%) showed more balanced contributions from both intensity and volume. Conclusions A higher %VPA, independent of total activity volume, is inversely associated with eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. Intensity consistently demonstrated a higher preventive potential than total PA volume. These findings support, whenever possible, prioritizing higher-intensity activities in clinical and public health interventions aimed at preventing non-communicable diseases.
Wei et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in General population (n=472,138). Vigorous physical activity (%VPA) vs. 0% VPA was evaluated on Incidence of eight chronic diseases and all-cause mortality (29%-61% lower risk, p=<0.001). Participants with >4% vigorous physical activity had 29%–61% lower risks of eight major chronic diseases and all-cause mortality compared with those with 0% VPA (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: