PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Logos Made Code: Analogical Compression and the Limits of Self-Audit

View Full Paper
MBMartin Brodeur

Key Points

  • This research explores the limitations of self-auditing in large language models (LLMs) using analogical compression.
  • Utilized orthogonal probing to identify failures in a production system.
  • Compared failure discovery rates between orthogonal probing and same-axis self-audit.
  • Analyzed 58 documented failure classes using persistent homology to find topological structures.
  • Implemented a production reference with 85 deterministic validators and 524 end-to-end tests.
  • Orthogonal probing discovered approximately 80% of failures, while self-audit revealed only 20%.
  • Identified 20 significant topological loops in failure classes using persistent homology.
  • Demonstrated that LLMs struggle to audit their own compression mechanisms, indicating structural limits.

Abstract

Preprint. Orthogonal probing discovers roughly 4–5× more failures than same-axis self-audit (~80% vs ~20%) in a 350,000-line production system. We argue this asymmetry reflects a structural limit: LLMs trained via analogical compression cannot audit their own compression manifold from within. Formalized via Tarski undefinability and Rice's theorem. Persistent homology on 58 documented failure classes yields β₁ = 20 significant topological loops. Production reference implementation: 85 deterministic validators, 524 E2E tests, 8-axis probe framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martin Brodeur (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6556e6a8c024954b96c1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19302794
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper