Co-pyrolysis of sludge and plastics has gradually emerged as a crucial technical approach for waste reduction and resource recovery. This study develops high-precision, interpretable prediction models and quantifies the contributions of core risk factors to environmental risks. Based on the experimental datasets from 2015 to 2025, which include operational parameters and eight potential toxic elements (PTEs) with four chemical speciation fractions: acid-soluble/exchangeable (F1), reducible (F2), oxidizable (F3), and residual (F4), we constructed six machine learning models. Based on the experimental datasets from 2015 to 2025, which include operational parameters and eight potential toxic elements (PTEs) chemical speciation (F1–F4), we constructed six machine learning models. Feature importance analysis and Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis were employed to identify core risk factors and interpret the model’s decision logic. Results indicate that XGBoost, Random Forest and CatBoost outperform other models, achieving test accuracies of 0.94, 0.92, and 0.90, with weighted F1-Scores of 0.94, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively. Feature importance highlights the most important features for the six different models, with Cd-F4, As-F1, and Cu-F4 contributing most significantly to the model predictions. SHAP analysis quantified the contributions of each feature to the model predictions, verified Cd-F4 as the primary risk discriminant, and further revealed that F1 and F4 of PTEs are key factors in distinguishing risk levels. This study proposes an interpretable machine learning framework, providing a theoretical basis for the optimization of the sludge and plastic co-pyrolysis process and the assessment of potential risks.
Liu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.