As the number of transfer students from community colleges increases in many four-year institutions, the development of transfer-specific programming has become a priority. Transfer students often don’t have the same opportunities or time to form communities with students or mentorship experiences with faculty. Although they see the value of research and forming a community, they feel like they must take a heavy STEM load to graduate on time (1). In addition, developing a first-semester curriculum for transfer students can be difficult due to the wide range of coursework they bring. Course-based research experiences (CUREs) are an opportunity to engage transfer students their first semester, forming an important part of their introduction to an often larger university. This allows them to form a cohort, interact with faculty in a small lab setting, and assures a mechanism for course credit toward graduation. Training faculty to develop or revise lab courses through workshops that emphasize the value of CUREs has led us to increase student-faculty and faculty-faculty interactions while fostering student success. Several faculty have provided brief overviews of research questions that can be used to form the basis of a CURE. One example from our neurobiology faculty is presented here. Expanding these CURE options and the number of faculty able to teach these courses has increased our transfer students’ sense of community.
PARKS et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: