Elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test demonstrate potential to replace invasive liver biopsies for assessing disease progression and treatment efficacy in patients with MASH.
Do noninvasive tests accurately assess disease progression and treatment efficacy in patients with MASH compared to liver biopsy?
Noninvasive tests such as elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test show potential to replace liver biopsy for assessing disease progression and treatment efficacy in MASH.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Background & Aims: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a progressive liver disease that poses significant public health challenges. Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnostic and prognostic use in patients with MASH, its invasiveness limits its practical application in routine care and large-scale trials. This narrative review explores the growing role of noninvasive tests in the assessment of disease progression and treatment efficacy in MASH. Approach & Results: This review represents expert opinion synthesizing current literature on the most widely used noninvasive tests being assessed as front-line biomarkers for identification of patients with MASLD at risk of outcomes and/or in need of pharmacological intervention, and that are being used to assess treatment response in the context of clinical trials, and how they may be translated into clinical practice. Among these, elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test are highlighted for their potential to replace liver biopsy in clinical settings and trials. These methods are analyzed for their accuracy and ability to monitor therapeutic response, emphasizing their growing importance in providing reliable measures of clinical improvement as drug-development efforts for MASH intensify. Conclusions: This synthetic review aims to provide a roadmap for federal regulators updating and potentially revising the requirements for demonstrating histologic improvement in MASH clinical trials, and for practitioners to translate this information into clinical practice. The ultimate goal is to reduce the reliance on liver biopsy while maintaining the rigor necessary to evaluate therapeutic efficacy, thus accelerating the path to approval for new MASH treatments.
Sanyal et al. (Mon,) reported a other. Elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test demonstrate potential to replace invasive liver biopsies for assessing disease progression and treatment efficacy in patients with MASH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: