Additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, has attracted sustained interest in pharmaceutical research as a potential platform for patient-centric and personalized drug delivery. Unlike conventional batch manufacturing, 3D printing enables digitally driven fabri-cation of dosage forms with controlled dose strength, geometry, internal architecture, and drug-release behaviour. While these attributes offer clear conceptual advantages, their translation in-to routine pharmaceutical practice remains limited and warrants critical evaluation. This review provides a comparative and formulation-focused analysis of the major 3D printing technol-ogies investigated for pharmaceutical applications, including fused deposition modelling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and powder-based binder jetting. Particular emphasis is placed on formulation requirements, material constraints, process-inducedstability concerns, and suitability for specific dosage forms. Among the available techniques, powder-based and extrusion-based approaches demonstrate broader applicability for immedi-ate- and modified-release tablets, Oro dispersible systems, implants, and fixed-dose combina-tion products such as polypills. Despite the regulatory approval of the first 3D-printed medi-cine in 2015, clinical and commercial translation has largely remained at the proof-of-concept stage. Key limitations include the narrow range of pharmaceutically acceptable printable ma-terials, drug–excipient compatibility and thermal degradation risks, challenges in achieving scalable and reproducible manufacturing, and the absence of harmonized regulatory and qual-ity-control frameworks. By integrating recent advances with a critical appraisal of these unre-solved barriers, this review clarifies the realistic potential of pharmaceutical 3D printing and outlines key considerations required for its integration into mainstream drug development.
Blessye Alluri1, Abhay Kumar1, Divyanjali Aitham1, Deepika Akulapalleswar1, Vaishnavi Azmera1, Surisetty Sridevi1* (Wed,) studied this question.