A Cost and Healthcare Utilization Analysis of Minimally-Invasive Alveolar Bone Grafting Techniques Compared With Open Iliac Crest Harvesting
Puntos clave
The aim is to analyze the cost and healthcare utilization of minimally-invasive alveolar bone grafting techniques versus open iliac crest harvesting.
Conducted a cost analysis comparing both bone grafting techniques.
Evaluated length of hospital stay for each procedure.
Assessed overall financial burden on patients and hospitals.
Minimally-invasive techniques led to shorter hospital stays.
Higher initial equipment costs were offset by reduced overall expenses.
Patients experienced less financial burden with the minimally-invasive method.
Resumen
The Acumed bone graft harvesting technique can reduce the financial burden on patients and hospitals compared with open techniques by primarily decreasing length of stay, despite higher equipment costs.
Me gusta
Guardar
Compartir
Me gusta
Guardar
Compartir
A Cost and Healthcare Utilization Analysis of Minimally-Invasive Alveolar Bone Grafting Techniques Compared With Open Iliac Crest Harvesting | Synapse