Does the absence of standard modifiable risk factors in patients presenting with NSTEMI impact 30-day and long-term mortality compared to those with risk factors?
NSTEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors have unexpectedly higher 30-day mortality and receive fewer secondary prevention medications compared to those with traditional risk factors.
Background A significant proportion of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) have no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) and have unexpected worse 30-day outcomes compared with those with SMuRFs. The aim of this article is to examine outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI in the absence of SMuRFs. Methods and Results Presenting features, management, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI without SmuRFs (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) were compared with those with SmuRFs in the Swedish MI registry SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; 2005-2018). Cox proportional hazard models were used. Out of 99 718 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI, 11 131 (11.2%) had no SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio HR, 1.20 95% CI, 1.10-1.30, PP for all <0.0001), with lowest rates observed in women without SMuRFs. In patients who survived to 30 days, rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death were lower in patients without SMuRFs compared with those with risk factors, over 12 years. Conclusions One in 10 patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation MI present without traditional risk factors. The excess 30-day mortality rate in this group emphasizes the need for both improved population-based strategies for prevention of MI, as well as the need for equitable evidence-based treatment at the time of an MI.
Figtree et al. (Mon,) studied this question.