PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2018Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine287 citationsOpen Access

High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training within cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AHAmanda L. HannanWHWayne HingVSVini Simas

Structured PICO

Does high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve cardiorespiratory fitness compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in participants of cardiac rehabilitation?

P
Population
Participants of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), including patients with coronary artery disease
I
Intervention
High-intensity interval training (HIIT)
C
Comparator
Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT)
O
Outcome
Cardiorespiratory fitnesssurrogate

HIIT is superior to MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in cardiac rehabilitation, particularly in 7-12 week programs for CAD patients, with a similar safety profile.

Abstract

HIIT is superior to MICT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness in participants of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness are significant for CR programs of >6-week duration. Programs of 7-12 weeks' duration resulted in the largest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness for patients with coronary artery disease. HIIT appears to be as safe as MICT for CR participants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hannan et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5725175589c71d767e706https://doi.org/10.2147/oajsm.s150596
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper