This paper responds to systematic objections raised against thesuperdense ether theory developed in previous works 1, 2, 3. Weaddress six main points: (1) the enormous ether density (1013 kg/m³)and the absence of drag; (2) the derivation of the proton-to-electronmass ratio mp/me = 1836 without adjustable parameters; (3) theclaimed precision of the isotope mass tables; (4) the instantaneous lon-gitudinal gravitational mode and causality; (5) the predicted Shapiroparameter deviation γ −1 = 2×10−5; and (6) the predicted anomalouswater relaxation (5MHz, τ ∼ 103–104s). We show that each objectioneither has a concrete answer within the theory or leads to a testableprediction, demonstrating that the model is scientifically sound andfalsifiable.
Jensen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.