Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
We report the discovery and optimization of a potent inhibitor against the papain-like protease (PLpro) from the coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). This unique protease is not only responsible for processing the viral polyprotein into its functional units but is also capable of cleaving ubiquitin and ISG15 conjugates and plays a significant role in helping SARS-CoV evade the human immune system. We screened a structurally diverse library of 50,080 compounds for inhibitors of PLpro and discovered a noncovalent lead inhibitor with an IC(50) value of 20 microM, which was improved to 600 nM via synthetic optimization. The resulting compound, GRL0617, inhibited SARS-CoV viral replication in Vero E6 cells with an EC(50) of 15 microM and had no associated cytotoxicity. The X-ray structure of PLpro in complex with GRL0617 indicates that the compound has a unique mode of inhibition whereby it binds within the S4-S3 subsites of the enzyme and induces a loop closure that shuts down catalysis at the active site. These findings provide proof-of-principle that PLpro is a viable target for development of antivirals directed against SARS-CoV, and that potent noncovalent cysteine protease inhibitors can be developed with specificity directed toward pathogenic deubiquitinating enzymes without inhibiting host DUBs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ratia et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6ded1a0177bf533ed93a5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805240105
Kiira Ratia
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Scott D. Pegan
University of California, Riverside
Jun Takayama
Josai University
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Purdue University West Lafayette
University of Illinois Chicago
Loyola University Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: