Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Study DesignExploratory prospective observational cohort.ObjectivesAim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcome, and surgical efficiency of a novel universal delivery system that allows full-percutaneous extraforaminal, trans-Kambin lumbar interbody fusion with a large-footprint lumbar interbody cage using only fluoroscopic imaging and open-surgery instrumentation.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated patients that underwent elective trans-Kambin TLIF surgery with a large-footprint interbody cage using a novel universal delivery system. Clinical follow-up was evaluated pre-and post-operatively with Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, while radiologic follow-up was performed with a computed tomography scan and standing films post-operatively at hospital discharge and 1 year follow-up.ResultsA total of 47 patients were evaluated. Clinically, post-operative VAS and ODI scores significantly (P < 0.001) improved compared to pre-operative scores and 29.4 months mean follow-up. Radiologic evaluation yielded an intervertebral fusion rate of 90% of the operated levels and a significant increase in segmental lordosis by 3.7°. Median surgical time for interbody cage insertion per level was 28 minutes. Complications included 14 (29%) cases with transitory post-operative radiculitis, 4 (8%) cases with partial muscle weakness and 2 (4%) cases that required revision surgery. Post-operative ambulation started at a median 5 hours and median hospital length of stay was 28 hours.ConclusionsA new universal delivery system allows overcoming most limitations of current full-endoscopic trans-Kambin fusion as it allows a time- efficient full-percutaneous insertion of a large-footprint interbody cage under fluoroscopy imaging only, with standard open-surgery instruments and optional endoscopic visualization.
Morgenstern et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: