Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Trust is intriguing. Trust is valued—the alleged crisis of trust is a famine not a flood—yet misplaced trust can be dangerous. Trust is needed when we lack knowledge, yet we have most trust in those we know best. Trust bestowed can be both an honour and a burden; distrust is rarely welcome. Practical reasons to trust can outstrip the evidence, yet counter-evidence can make it impossible to trust. Recent philosophical work on trust has emphasised its importance to both epistemology and ethics, asking whether reasons to trust someone must be based on reasons to think her trustworthy (e.g. Hinchman 2005, Faulkner 2007, McGeer 2008, Hieronymi 2008). But this work, and the literature it builds upon, is curiously lopsided. To understand trust, we must also understand distrust, yet distrust is usually treated as a mere afterthought, or mistakenly equated with the absence of trust. In this paper I offer an account of both trust and distrust. Roughly speaking, to trust someone is to rely upon that person to fulfil a commitment, whilst distrust involves an expectation of unfulfilled commitment. Whilst I advocate this commitment theory, my main concern is to demonstrate the importance of providing a unified account of both trust and distrust, either through commitment or otherwise. We need to understand both trust and distrust if we are to understand the different ways in which trust can go wrong, the reasons why both trust and distrust are sometimes unwanted, the nature and limitations of trustworthiness, and the difference between unpredictability and untrustworthiness. I will adopt two common assumptions. First, trust is primarily a three-place relation, involving two people and a task: you may trust me to look after your children, to keep a secret, or to tell the truth (Holton 1994, Jones 1996, Hardin 2002, Hieronymi 2008). We do sometimes speak of simply trusting someone, and I will discuss this generalised trust in section 7.2.. Second, trust involves expectations about both competence and willingness: when you trust me to look after your children, you take it that I am capable of childcare, and that I will exercise that capability as required. Following Annette Baier, philosophers usually distinguish genuine trust from mere reliance (Baier 1986, 234; Hieronymi 2008, 215; Holton 1994, 2–3; Jones 1996, 14; Jones 2004, 4; McLeod 2002, 2002, we rely upon we do not the trust we sometimes can be not to misplaced trust from to misplaced I trust you to look after a yet you I may and will be in I may an that I rely on a to the yet the the I will be it be to the or to an from can be upon are in which people are upon you to work, and the to you do this not to your I rely on you to my I that you will do and I make But this reliance not to you me if you the and I not to if I on as a be with if in not trust (Baier 1986, to people are sometimes also in this is a between trust in a which can be mere But trust from mere reliance with we of trusting a to a distinguish two of and or and 2007, trust from mere I will with the and whilst that we can the of trust mere on a which is not in is trust, not mere is a mere is to is from mere is to be to and in it is a in the and in the of is person is simply someone can be upon to or to is in in need not to when you you do not demonstrate trustworthiness, and you demonstrate if you of trust to this between trust and mere But it is a to trust distrust. is not mere absence of I rely upon the to the the reasons I do not trust the But do I distrust is not mere absence of trust. distrust is not mere absence of trust, distrust has a between trust and mere reliance in different to misplaced trust and misplaced reliance the between distrust and mere in different to misplaced distrust and misplaced I that I have and In if I take my to be that it is after not be I on an not to not upon people need not to have me in I do not rely upon to me But it be wrong, to that I distrust my in this have not to me and is that do me I to be I need not about my not to rely on it be me to in that I have my to me or to my Whilst I do not rely upon my to me it be to distrust in this can after be to me trust distrust in this is the in which I rely upon you to my trusting you to do and not if you I do not rely upon my to me I do not distrust in this the that do not me not of untrustworthiness. distrust is mere as trust is as we distinguish from mere we distinguish from mere do not me are in this not as is a between trust and distrust, is a between and the trust distrust, are trustworthy not simply the of be I will the philosophers have trust from mere I have distrust from mere But is it to rely upon someone to do I will adopt that to rely on someone to is to on the that will this can of that will it is with that will not (Holton is not a of its are not is sometimes a of In this on someone to do your in can rely upon me to the whilst of you to on the that I will of and this the you reliance in this or this is of I this someone with to involves not upon her to upon her not to distrust not of involves not on a on the are to about of of and the that are sometimes when I need your it may make difference whether or not I the that you if I do not have to I am the that different of trust. of between reliance and can be to distrust trust, as I philosophical of trust are to the difference between trust and mere also to the difference between distrust and mere is a and a why an account of trust also an account of distrust. the and expectation be that the two are in an account of trust when trust is and when it is In a trust may be either distrust is or trust distrust is will of and when trust is But on the difference between trust and mere distrust as an Trust is to this with a of the of the I trust you to look after my I rely upon you to do and I take it that you have the of after my about the of In this I will of trust the nature of distrust. I account of trust a will on those Hardin and Jones are and in the literature Jones a different account from on the and Hardin that when we trust someone, we the to her has an in or her with In trusting you to look after my I take it that you will do you have my in the your after the is in your In when I rely upon the to the I do not have expectation about the or I it has an of that the and competence of will to the of with with the expectation that the will be and the that we are on it is that be an not a that the and trust, are not to the to on her a between genuine and about the we distrust to a the of the must go the to lack the lack the do not and do not of we do not distrust when we not to rely upon is in the do not me I do not rely upon to me I know that have not my in and I am not about in the not me to distrust my are not and if do me with I about not trust distrust is in this if distrust is a of a the this must go the to lack distrust involves the to of will or the to have an in why we do not distrust are not and why I not distrust my are not to me But expectation of will expectation of to my is distrust. someone and to her be if not to either or will to and not about are expectations distrust, in with that a person to have me my I rely on this person to I know that me and is to my But my to her to distrust, is and in her that I trust that I do not have to distrust the between distrust, and not in her if to be I I need not about my of I have not the the of and I have that account of trust can distrust and this reasons which to Hardin and Jones take to distinguish genuine trust from mere But about distrust in either genuine trust or genuine distrust is a either or that trust, distrust, and to the Hardin and Jones to think of distrust as a of lack of trust 2002, Jones 1996, also McLeod 2002, we about the is it about the the and which that are not of either trust or distrust in the that trust is not in is that trust or distrust is of trust do not the the difference between distrust and But do not the In this section I will discuss account of trust in and that whilst can be to distrust, are in I think that the difference between trust and reliance is that trust involves a the person you are trusting trusting someone is of as a But if this is it it is that we do not the as an or when you do trust a you need not trust in can trust a person to do trusting to do the someone to be a in this I trust its with as and the of Holton not distrust in the also to be a we do not distrust is about this Hardin and Jones Holton is lack of to distrust. to that trust in someone is is the to which we adopt the to that But we distrust, trust, someone in a this in to that as are to the in of distrust. can to trust to distrust in a In either of trust and distrust be an Trust involves of why someone not to be to do not to But that not to be in that trusting someone to do is to do can be an that my do after to me do not or my trust in this to me a not to as and not to me if to the are most of after my are me to know that have my and that me yet to an of trust between it in the most trusting that I my and to rely on if I I do not my to make this a of trust. I do not to in a if I and do I that to my We to a trusting to the we do not to of trust. Holton the as a of trust, and this is distrust But upon someone to you take a not trusting that the of trust and distrust. not to rely upon someone to you take a to your not that the can sometimes not to a of trust and distrust. But are the of the my to my not reliance trust. Holton that is not a of trust we not of a account of distrust. has a both trust and distrust. it is that this if we are to understand when in a is and when mere reliance or is the is to the the ways to and the expectations of the that not that to is I will take it that the of the to the of have this to an a I do not the between in of and and the of reliance I have from But I do not have to and will on which must do the work of trust from mere are to and to when you trust someone, you are to if you through will or and whilst you not if you you may think that an is this is a of her account which as on to this is trust, distrust understand as a to a to have this to a to be is needed the absence of expectations are from Jones expectations from we can of someone that will in do we of Jones it is that the expectations in distrust are the expectations which be in trusting that person in that distrust is a to a to the or to think that an is distrust is trust, not an of trust. Jones expectations to to can the that in can to with in I am my to that I will I do not to to be to my not account of trust in of expectations can be to an account of distrust which is as it But it not go the of trust do an account of it is that the to the (e.g. of the is it about someone which it to trust Holton and Jones in tell about the do about the of the to which those are to the of trust, of distrust. But we need In we need a about when trust, distrust or is is the to which is an is it to have expectations of is not a of or we it to to this distrust and trust can 2007, Jones 2002, We also need to understand the of and the of as are from and To do we need a about if can we will is to the epistemology of But we also need a about when it is to not to of the when we the of I that it is to trust or distrust someone to do if that person has an or commitment to In the I this in I its my concern is to that the is an are the of people to which either trust or distrust is an I this with to commitment, are the in which you to work, you are a of and I to the to you in this is of not trust, and your in this about whether you are is not a of you have commitment to me with But if we the as to commitment, it to look a of trust. we you your the I to and To the that this involves a commitment on your it me to and if you to and I go lack of commitment also about the do not me are in this it be of me to distrust or to in have not to me and that do have commitment to me and to do is not a of To trust someone to do is to that has a commitment to and to rely upon her to that commitment. To distrust someone to do is to that has a commitment to and yet not rely upon her to that commitment. In I will this account of trust and distrust to work, its and its But the of commitment I will also discuss an to the In a commitment to do involves a to do this is the in which we can commitment to a But this is not the the commitment account of trust and distrust. this of commitment is when distrust is In the can be to has of if to to your I I be I have a commitment in the I have of is of the of commitment, is not the to commitment. account of trust and distrust upon this I do not offer a of commitment. my account of trust and distrust be to about are are also of commitment, and of and in which either trust or distrust is and in which trust or distrust is to the that trust and distrust commitment of this We trust people to do which we know have not to I trust my not to the when to in I trust to me To make the account I must a of can be or or and or or In I will take it that expectation and to commitment we take to in section I will that involves commitment, that trusting the of the I commitment the of trust and and I have the of commitment to that trusting someone to do is a of her to do and upon her to fulfil her whilst involves someone to have an yet not upon her to fulfil and trust to whilst McLeod trust involves the expectation that the will of of either the or the we on this an account of both trust and distrust. an account the of trust, distrust, and the of trustworthy is not the of trustworthy not those expectations which are with I will to in the which and will the account in the section of the about when I someone, must I that has a commitment to is it that I that has a commitment to someone or I will take it that that we think the person has a commitment to someone or your to her to that will to the of the and your a you rely upon the to keep this you of it impossible you to and your I will take it that you trust your to keep her to your that Holton and Jones trust of you are to your if it is whether an to or to your In not a on when I trust someone, I take her to me to to my or to my commitment account in be that genuine is when we think someone has a commitment to We that you your to be that you your to trust that you can trust distrust her I will this I will to the when I discuss in section to Holton rely on your trusting is in to account of it also the commitment to a to your and the upon you to fulfil this commitment, the that you will do Holton is the not trust in with the commitment I that the trust an of why Holton and it that is a and not you the which you people are in this this about whether the you to the (Baier this to But I can the to you it you do not have a genuine commitment, the and this is why not trust have a a to the person has you about your and do not why the not distrust you that you are not an of either trust or distrust in of this the commitment account is not I to about and the of the of commitment can understand main concern is to that an of trust, distrust, and must it to have expectations of I commitment is of someone upon a to her the is the be someone upon as a to take her is in this this also to the on the can be dangerous. But trusting the can which go those on the of is that you have someone not to your trust. of can have and of in this whilst to the I will in to discuss the of when trust is if the is and not that is about or of trust, in to both the of and the of the of and its I will that is a a the of Trust is not we can be those we distrust, and distrust can expectation of can know that you will be that trust is impossible in a not trust. if I to you and you are not the may be yet I you and not through I may if you trust me and I my not your trust In may be of of the of untrustworthiness. on the that is a in trust, is a in when you are not we do not do when we those trust two of in trusting someone distrust, and trusting someone in a which reliance or of involves that someone is a this of in But the is a about whether someone is a expectations in this if a person we may we have not and the may of commitment account can we do when we to fulfil a commitment, the nature of this the a is to look to the literature on and is of whether we are in to fulfil the commitment, whether we are or in this is not if someone mistakenly I have a commitment, and I do not as that commitment I have not in someone is not of trust. in we simply to to rely upon or to think that we have we commitment and the of this of honour in make an we are not the of to trust I that not a you trust your to keep her to your the has commitment to But are you when someone to a commitment to a to that the person is the person to the commitment is not the between trust and is to that genuine is to those to are is not the commitment account it from a between two about that of your the it is to think of your your as you are to of the your and the it is to think that it is your is if her her to account of trust must make a between two whilst the or the whilst of the two of trust distrust as an and to the in trust. to trust someone to do is to rely upon her to do it the of trust is either when the is not or when the are upon in to have expectations of about my in do me in this be But if I will me when to trust in of expectations not when expectations are I expectations of my in of or not I also that will me I will when do not me and can to do trust and distrust Trust sometimes has in its usually this is on the of the that the of trust is between and trust not trust that trust is the of in the of as and We it to and to to trust in on the of the this is we make about trust which is an whilst of trust make it to understand it is to be trustworthy in To be trustworthy in to person is it is to be that it is that person to trust you to that to be trustworthy in to person is to have her and to on Jones it is to that person in that be and to her upon But do not if this is trustworthiness, trustworthy is not a of trustworthy to of people in of and trustworthy is not a of trustworthy to in is of as a of it will be to of to those of competence and We will be in different the of those to be trustworthy to if a generalised to to trust, to or it be people to be have trust to account of trust in of expectations in be a of to expectations may be and expectations is not a of untrustworthiness. involves to or this to the of expectations the commitment to that do not outstrip in as as in of people must sometimes trust this is the of We can to trustworthiness, if of commitment account of trust and distrust to understand about I have a three-place to do But we also speak of trusting person or to We can understand trust as reliance on someone to fulfil may and distrust as lack of trust is between the and the I may trust someone to fulfil her trusting her to fulfil in her the commitment account of trust and distrust the between trust, trustworthiness, trust and is a in a it must be a of a account of trustworthiness, whilst McLeod the of the we trustworthy people to be to be I with the of it is to a will the of this to the commitment you can trust someone to do her to be her commitment. may trust me to do you both that I have a commitment to do and that I will do that I will do it of my commitment. I am commitment have me in the absence of have this that I am To be trustworthy in it is to in with commitment, of about In of has reasons to do the we are to the in which we need the of a trustworthy person will her simply are her this is not a of in I have on trusting or someone to do But we also trusting or someone or Hinchman and Faulkner make between trust and and whilst not discuss trust, is to we can this a account of trust and distrust will of is a both an and a 1996, the commitment account of trust and distrust can trust or distrust in people a in to be a of trusting someone to do this is of But is a to to speak the or to speak I speak I speak not I can speak the Recent work has of which it is to make an is about whether knowledge, or is (e.g. and a I will take it that trusting someone as a is a of trusting that person to can be in of commitment to that is is the that also involves commitment to either or (e.g. my commitment of not that a is of in this of the about of commitment do we make in an the commitment account of trust and distrust can why of trust are to not We trust distrust people when are or we may about the truth of not a of or her and the do not commitment, are the of trust and distrust. We can sometimes I am my to rely upon my not to this as a of trust. But I to be a not trust, and I make untrustworthiness. is involves if I to a commitment, I must it as mere or someone to do involves both trust in her competence and trust in her to of is the to you are not to of trusting someone involves both trusting her to the truth and trusting her to speak can trust through either or and of is the to you lack the of we can trust and distrust in the of as commitment. But of trust do not the of trusting and someone a of First, do not distrust. We do not trust people in or in do we distrust Second, about whether to trust when are about or to trust someone is to take to have your you me a you your both in the if I your in your the I will tell you the truth if I But you are to the is you you to and either about your is an whether you trust it is has not your account has a to trust someone is to be about and competence a and to to be the that you are on you me a and I trusting I may this of about But the you and not whether you are on yet the of whether you trust also Faulkner the commitment account tell about the as the is is speak the or to speak you the whether or not to as whether or not to on the that the is may if is the commitment account can make of the difference between trusting and I have the you not of concern is to and you can trust or distrust as you But if you are on someone is not not to In my you can this a of the commitment this section commitment account of trust and distrust has is and the Holton and Jones as I an account of trust and distrust of its the between trust and distrust, about the and the of of both and the of trust. the commitment account and the account will the about 2002, the the and the are in as is commitment, is of my to both the commitment account and the the main of my paper has if you are that or of must be I think are in which we have and trust distrust is I am this in of the commitment we are in the In is an a of and in the as are you take your your if you and I in the and you that I am we you may to whether or not I will you But you are in that not you either to trust or to distrust me in this has or to and I have commitment to you and you trust or distrust me in this I you I do not demonstrate if I I not that of untrustworthiness. But of I have an to you whether or not I are and may about whether trust and distrust are in may about whether commitment has in this to distinguish between commitment in the and commitment of the which can when the person has of that commitment. are not in the commitment account the But is also a to between of and of trust and distrust. is a the which must be if we are to be trustworthy on we do not on which we the of to have on the between and it the of untrustworthiness. and To someone as trustworthy is to about to to is to to a of and to that is to make a of of we can why is that it untrustworthiness. But the of as is to do is about as as can To someone in is her a not are ways in which we can to not through that is is an of why it is between and a between and trust, to look a account of trust and distrust which not on of the commitment account the
Katherine Hawley (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: