Pulse nav.journalClub Debates activos Tendencias Explorar Investigadores

Download the App

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

© Synapse Social LLC, 2026

Política de privacidad

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review | Synapse

February 17, 2023Open Access

Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

More studies into recurrence rates and long-term complications are needed to determine the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic PEHs repair.

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Bhatt et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7d7c1ec32c73b01ae2eab https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-819

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis2019 · 116 citations
2Early robotic experience with paraesophageal hernia repair and Nissen fundoplication: short-term outcomes2008 · 18 citations
3A short history of robotic surgery2018 · 210 citations
4Robotic-Assisted Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Initial Experience at a Single Institution2016 · 51 citations
5Complications Following Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Are Higher Compared to Laparoscopy2021 · 39 citations