May 28, 2018Open Access

Measuring disability: a systematic review of the validity and reliability of the Global Activity Limitations Indicator (GALI)

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

GALI as inclusive one question instrument fits all conceptual characteristics specified for a global measure on participation restriction. In none of the studies, included in the review, there was evidence of a failing validity. The review shows that GALI has a good and sufficient concurrent and predictive validity, and reliability.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Oyen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80ca061e2ce1627d189c7 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0270-8

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Harmonising summary measures of population health using global survey instruments2016 · 32 citations
2Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.02010 · 1,832 citations
3The definition of disability: what is in a name?2006 · 415 citations
4Dignity not fully upheld when seeking health care: Experiences expressed by individuals suffering from Ehlers–Danlos syndrome2009 · 126 citations
5Disability policies and government programs1979 · 63 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo