September 14, 2009Open Access

The GRADE System for Rating Clinical Guidelines

BKBrian P. KavanaghUniversity College Dublin

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

Brian Kavanagh critiques the GRADE system of grading guidelines, arguing that even though it has evolved through the Evidence-Based Medicine movement, there is no evidence that GRADE itself is reliable.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Brian P. Kavanagh (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d81943617ce96c42ae2f43 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000094

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>Bacteremia: Risk Factors for Mortality and Influence of Delayed Receipt of Effective Antimicrobial Therapy on Clinical Outcome2003 · 573 citations
2ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery—Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)2002 · 409 citations
3Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock2001 · 10,804 citations
4Users' guides to the medical literature1993 · 2,981 citations
5Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline2007 · 975 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo