Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Purpose To investigate for a prognostic index (PI) to personalize recommendations for salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC). Methods Patients with lrNPC from two academic institutions (Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center SYSUCC-A; n = 251 (training cohort) and National Cancer Centre Singapore NCCS; n = 114 and SYSUCC-B n = 193 (validation cohorts)) underwent salvage treatment with IMRT from 2001 to 2015. Primary and secondary clinical end points were overall survival (OS) and grade 5 toxicity-free rate (G5-TFR), respectively. Covariate inclusion to the PIs was qualified by a multivariable two-sided P recurrence hazard ratio HR, 1.01/mL increase P recurrence HR, 1.02/year increase [ P = .008; repeat IMRT equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions EQD2 ≥ 68 Gy HR, 1.42 P = .03; prior radiotherapy-induced grade ≥ 3 toxicities HR, 1.90 P = .001; recurrent tumor rT-category 3 to 4 HR, 1.96 P = .005), in ascending order of weight. Discrimination of the PI for OS was comparable between training and both validation cohorts (Harrell's C = 0.71 SYSUCC-A, 0.72 NCCS, and 0.69 SYSUCC-B); discretization by using a fixed PI score cutoff of 252 determined from the training data set yielded low- and high-risk subgroups with disparate OS in the validation cohorts (NCCS HR, 3.09 95% CI, 1.95 to 4.89; SYSUCC-B HR, 3.80 95% CI, 2.55 to 5.66). Our five-factor PI predicted OS and G5-TFR (predicted v observed 36-month OS and G5-TFR, 22% v 15% and 38% v 44% for high-risk NCCS and 26% v 31% and 45% v 46% for high-risk SYSUCC-B). Conclusion We present a validated PI for robust clinical stratification of radioresistant NPC. Low-risk patients represent ideal candidates for curative repeat IMRT, whereas novel clinical trials are needed in the unfavorable high-risk subgroup.
Li et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: