September 9, 2019Open Access

A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

We present a comprehensive evaluation of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. All the code used for the evaluation is available on GitHub (https: //github. com/tabdelaal/scRNAseqBenchmark). Additionally, we provide a Snakemake workflow to facilitate the benchmarking and to support the extension of new methods and new datasets.

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Abdelaal et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8aa01a5ecc596b5d18230 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1795-z

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction2018 · 7,538 citations
2Mapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq2018 · 445 citations
3Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells2017 · 7,829 citations
4Moana: A robust and scalable cell type classification framework for single-cell RNA-Seq data2018 · 82 citations
5Deep learning does not outperform classical machine learning for cell-type annotation2019 · 36 citations

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo