Does empagliflozin improve cardiac electrophysiological remodeling and decrease ventricular arrhythmia susceptibility in post-myocardial-infarction mice?
Empagliflozin improves post-MI electrophysiological remodeling and decreases the substrate for ventricular fibrillation in a mouse model of myocardial infarction.
Background: Recent clinical trials indicate that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes in myocardial infarction (MI) patients, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. As arrhythmia often occurs during myocardial infarction, it is the main cause of death. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of empagliflozin (EMPA), an SGLT2 inhibitor, on cardiac electrophysiological remodeling and arrhythmia susceptibility of myocardial infarction mice. Methods: ECG was obtained from mice 1 week after MI to determine the QT interval. In an electrophysiological study and optical mapping was performed to evaluate the function of EMPA and underlying mechanisms of post-myocardial-infarction in mice. Results: EMPA treatment significantly reduced the QT interval of MI mice (MI + EMPA 50.24 ms vs. MI 64.68 ms). The membrane potential and intracellular Ca Cai were mapped from 13 MI hearts and five normal hearts using an optical mapping technique. A dynamic pacing protocol was used to determine action potential duration and Cai at baseline and after EMPA (10 umol/L) infusion. EMPA perfusion did not change the APD80 and CaT80 in normal ventricles while shortening them in an infarct zone, bordering zone, and remote zone of MI hearts at 200 ms, 150 ms, 120 ms, and 100 ms pacing cycle length. The conduction velocity of infarcted ventricles was 0.278 m/s and 0.533 m/s in normal ventricles at baseline (p Conclusion: Treatment with EMPA improved post-MI electrophysiological remodeling and decreased substrate for VF of MI mice. The inhibitors of SGLT2 may be a new class of agents for the prevention of ventricle arrhythmia after chronic MI.
Xue et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: