Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The reliability of recall patient reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, satisfaction and symptoms, varies substantially. The objectives of this special report are to identify key issues to consider in study design and provide suggestions for minimizing bias in studies including patient reported outcomes. A MEDLINE search identified several areas in which patient recall is subject to bias. Concordance between patient recall and baseline assessments (e.g., prior to an event or medical intervention) for these patient reported outcomes varies depending on the event being recalled, time since the event, and patient clinical and demographic characteristics. Symptom recall tends to be better than recall of health-related quality of life or pain intensity. Specific questionnaire techniques may help minimize the impact of recall bias. Further research is required to determine what factors or patient characteristics predict improved recall and what techniques minimize recall bias.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schmier et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69da20a40f32475823a3cef2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.4.2.159
Jordana K. Schmier
Open Society Foundations
Michael T. Halpern
Northwestern University
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Exponent (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...