January 22, 2022Open Access

Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

The performance of all scoring systems and pathways was suboptimal in the identification of patients at risk of bacteraemia presenting to the emergency department.

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Sparks et al. (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da8e5ca6045d71bfa3d190 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Who Needs a Blood Culture? A Prospectively Derived and Validated Prediction Rule2008 · 271 citations
2Prediction of bacteremia in the emergency department2014 · 75 citations
3The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures: A Comprehensive Analysis of 500 Episodes of Bacteremia and Fungemia in Adults. II. Clinical Observations, with Special Reference to Factors Influencing Prognosis1983 · 480 citations
4Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit2014 · 1,272 citations
5Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis1992 · 13,207 citations

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo