October 16, 2017Open Access

Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty - a systematic review

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

The majority of the studies included did not describe a complete procedure of HGS measurement. The high heterogeneity between the protocols used, in sarcopenia and frailty studies, create an enormous difficulty in drawing comparative conclusions among them.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Sousa‐Santos et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db1caf78a3e0e288684d38 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0625-y

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2009 · 45,129 citations
2Testosterone, Sex Hormone–Binding Globulin, and Frailty in Older Men2007 · 116 citations
3Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Healthy Korean Elderly Women2015 · 23 citations
4Handgrip strength testing: A review of the literature1999 · 512 citations
5Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia in older adults with intellectual disabilities2012 · 110 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo